Andrae v. Andrae

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a nunc pro tunc order was proper to correct a clerical error in the judgment which was a result of transposed terms
• finding that a nunc pro tunc order was proper to correct a clerical error in the judgment, which was a result of transposed terms
• holding movant failed to show there was a clerical error in the trial court's recording of its judgment where he failed to provide evidence demonstrating that a different judgment was entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).