Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that unequivocal medical testimony requires the medical witness to do more than testify that the claimant’s conditions or symptoms might have been or probably were the result of the claimant’s work
• medical testimony is unequivocal and sufficient if the expert testifies that in her professional opinion she believes the fact exists.
• medical testimony is unequivocal and sufficient if the expert testifies that in her professional opinion she believes the fact exists.
• “nervous tension plus a very marked letdown feeling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).