· 5/20/2008
Andino v. Fischer
Citations
- 555 F. Supp. 2d 418
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41436
- 2008 WL 2190958
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \It is well established that in this Circuit the standard for an entry of a TRO is the same as for a preliminary injunction.\
- “It is well established that in this Circuit the standard for an entry of a TRO is the same as for a preliminary injunction.”
- “It is well established that in this Circuit the standard for an entry of a TRO is the same as for a preliminary injunction.”
- “It is well established that in this Circuit the standard for an entry of a TRO is the same as for a preliminary injunction.”
- “It is well established that in this Circuit the standard for an entry of a TRO is the same as for a preliminary injunction.”
- “It is well established that in this Circuit the standard for an entry of a TRO is the same as for a preliminary injunction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Victor Marrero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.