Andika, Eric AKA Eric Gachucha Andika

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even a \statement about a single asset\ can be a \statement respecting the debtor's financial condition\ for purposes of § 523(a)(2)(B)
• holding that Congress “presumptively was aware of the longstanding judicial interpretation of the phrase [included in a newly enacted statute] and intended for it to retain its established meaning”
• observing that when a statute uses the phrase 7. The language in R.C. 149.43(B)(8) being discussed in this case was codified in R.C. 149.43(B)(4
• finding that an oral statement by a debtor that he had not received his tax refund did not satisfy the writing requirement of section 523(a)(2)(B)
• holding “that a statement is ‘respecting’ a debtor’s financial condition” under 11 U.S.C. USCA11 Case: 22-10740 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 04/13/2023 Page: 17 of 22 22-10740 Opinion of the Court 17 § 523(a)(2)(B
• explaining that a statement about a single asset bears on a debtor’s overall financial condition and can help indicate whether a debtor is able to repay a given debt.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).