Skip to main content
· 3/22/1991

Anderton v. Gentry

Citations

  • 577 So. 2d 1261
  • 1991 WL 69467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the statements amounted only to slander per quod, Anderton must plead and prove special damages.”
  • “Slander per se is actionable if it imputes to the plaintiff an indictable offense involving infamy or moral turpitude.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.