Anderson's Administrator v. Darland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no general jurisdiction where emails “[a]t most, . . . reflect[ed] that [defendant] had a handful of discussions of business-related matters (instigated by [plaintiff]) with persons based in New York.”
• “Merely attaching a contract does not allege a breach of its terms—the complaint must identify the contractual obligation that was breached and allege how.”
• plaintiff could not sue for infringement as beneficial owner where FAC did not allege that he assigned copyright title in exchange for royalties
• internal quotation 4 I may consider this allegation in deciding the motions to dismiss because Wang is proceeding pro se. See Smith, 2020 WL 1689752, at . marks omitted
• discussing New York contract law principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).