Anderson v. Wiggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “federal credit union–although perhaps misleading in use of the word ‘federal’–is not a government agency, but rather is a private corporation or association”
• dismissing private action based on purported violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because criminal statutes “cannot be used to grant plaintiff access to this, or any other, federal court”
• “A federal credit union—although perhaps misleading in use of the word ‘federal’—is not a government agency, but rather is a private corporation or association.”
• same where the plaintiff brought constitutional claims against a federal credit union and a private business
• “Private causes of action are also precluded for the criminal statutes located at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 241.”
• “[Plaintiff] pled that [defendant’s] violation was deliberate and knowing. A default judgment of willfulness, therefore, could be appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).