Anderson v. White

Citations

• 18 Wash. 658
• 52 P. 231
• 1898 Wash. LEXIS 604

Syllabus

<p>FUAUDULENT CONVEYANCES — COLLUSION OF VENDEE —EVIDENCE — OBJECTIONS TO ADMISSION—WEIGHT OF TESTIMONY.</p> <p>Where there is sufficient testimony to warrant the verdict of a jury, it will not be disturbed on appeal, although the weight of testimony may appear to the court to be the other way.</p> <p>When an objection to the admission of testimony is once made clearly and distinctly, and the grounds of the objection are stated, it is not necessary that it should be repeated to every following question which falls within the objection.</p> <p>Where collusion between a vendor and a vendee for the purpose of defrauding the former’s creditors is charged, declarations of the vendor in regard to the property, which remained in his possession, made subsequent to the alleged sale, are admissible in evidence for the purpose of establishing the vendee’s participation in the fraud charged.</p>