Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 7/27/1999

Anderson v. West

Citations

  • 12 Vet. App. 491
  • 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 742
  • 1999 WL 543303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the claimant's Thurber argument was unavailing because unlike in Thurber the medical opinion in Anderson was procured prior to the issuance of the most recent SOC or SSOC
  • noting that the claimant’s Thurber argument was unavailing because unlike in Thurber the medical opinion in Anderson was procured prior to the issuance of the most recent SOC or SSOC
  • finding no fair-process violation where the veteran and his counsel had opportunities to raise arguments to the Board but declined to do so
  • discussing Secretary’s obligation to provide to claimants copies of documents in custody of VA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene, Holdaway, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.