· 1/22/1986
Anderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
Citations
- 339 S.E.2d 660
- 177 Ga. App. 520
- 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in terminating duty to defend, “exhaust” means payment of settlement or judgment, wholly depleting policy amount which then discharges duty to defend insured
- term \exhaust\ does not mean paying policy limits into court without insured's consent, but rather paying settlement or judgment that entirely depletes policy limits
- term “exhaust” does not mean paying policy limits into court without insured’s consent, but rather paying settlement or judgment that entirely depletes policy limits
- term “exhaust” does not mean paying policy limits into court without insured’s consent, but rather paying settlement or judgment that entirely depletes policy limits
- “[w]e do not agree . . . that the term ‘exhaust’ encompasses the paying into court of the policy limits, but interpret that term to mean the payment either of a settlement or of a judgment wholly depleting the policy amount”
- “We do not agree . . . that the term ‘exhaust’ encompasses the paying into court of the policy limits, but interpret that term to mean the payment either of a settlement or of a judgment wholly depleting the policy amount.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sognier, Birdsong, Carley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.