Skip to main content
· 10/23/1992

Anderson v. Transit Authority

Citations

  • 491 N.W.2d 311
  • 241 Neb. 771
  • 1992 Neb. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that remand for new trial was necessary where trial court may have based its decision, inter alia, on incorrect rule of law
  • “[C]ommon carriers such as the defendant are required to exercise the utmost skill, diligence, and foresight consistent with the business in which they are engaged for the safety of their passengers and are liable for the slightest negligence proximately causing injury.”
  • duty to warn passengers of known dangerous conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.