Nebraska Supreme Court· 10/23/1992
Anderson v. Transit Authority
Citations
- 491 N.W.2d 311
- 241 Neb. 771
- 1992 Neb. LEXIS 303
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that remand for new trial was necessary where trial court may have based its decision, inter alia, on incorrect rule of law
- “[C]ommon carriers such as the defendant are required to exercise the utmost skill, diligence, and foresight consistent with the business in which they are engaged for the safety of their passengers and are liable for the slightest negligence proximately causing injury.”
- duty to warn passengers of known dangerous conditions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bradley v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-09-30· cited 42×
- POPPLE BY POPPLE v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-20· cited 32×
- Vilas v. SteavensonNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-12· cited 22×
- Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. GaubeNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-11-22· cited 2×
- Nucor Steel v. BalkaNebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-10-26· cited 2×
- Anasia Maison v. NJ Transit Corporation and Kelvin Coats (083484) (Essex County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2021-02-17
- Via Metropolitan Transit v. Curtis MeckTexas Supreme Court· 2020-06-26
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohnstad v. Omaha Public School District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-07-14· cited 44×
- Kumar v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-02-23· cited 38×
- Lesser v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-05-24· cited 38×
- Serritos v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-01-12· cited 22×
- Pruitt v. Lincoln City LinesNebraska Supreme Court· 1946-04-26· cited 14×
- Stauffer v. School District of TecumsehNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-07-12· cited 12×
- Schmid v. Malcolm School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-10-20· cited 7×
- Ware v. Yellow Cab, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-02-13· cited 4×
- Brooks v. Bi-State Development AgencySupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-03-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.