Anderson v. STATE, DSHS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee time spent commuting on a government run ferry is not “hours worked”
• \We are not persuaded that the Legislature intended to adopt the Portal to Portal Act; and we do not hold that it was adopted.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stevens v. Brink's Home Security, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-10-18· cited 42×
• Port Of Tacoma, V. Joel Sacks, Dept. Of L & I
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-09-21· cited 4×
• Busk v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc.
  W.D. Kentucky· 2017-06-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilson v. Steinbach
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 937×
• Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-03-30· cited 914×
• Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123
  Supreme Court· 1944-05-29· cited 713×
• Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers
  Supreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 171×
• Green v. A.P.C.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-08-20· cited 111×
• Inniss v. Tandy Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-08-31· cited 43×
• Anderson v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-07· cited 10×