Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 118 P.3d 184
  • 121 Nev. 511
  • 2005 Nev. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that comments constituting misconduct that are \merely passing in nature\ are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
  • recognizing that comments constituting misconduct that are \merely passing in nature\ are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
  • recognizing that a prosecutor's improper comments that are \merely passing in nature\ are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
  • recognizing that comments constituting misconduct that are “merely passing in nature” are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
  • recognizing that comments constituting misconduct that are \merely passing in nature\ are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
  • holding that the jury does not need to be unanimous on a particular theory of culpability to sustain a conviction for a single offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Douglas, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.