Anderson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Statements made to Canadian officials were admissible despite lack of procedures dictated by Miranda
• “[I]f the trial court determines a defendant cannot receive a fair trial, then it has the power to remove the case to some county in an adjoining judicial circuit,” id. at 178, 644 S.W.2d at 281.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alvarado v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 231×
• Britt v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-07-09· cited 52×
• Thomas Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and Steve Clark, Attorney General, State of Arkansas
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-03-18· cited 31×
• Arkansas Gazette Co. v. Goodwin
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-12-21· cited 31×
• Bussard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-10-16· cited 23×
• Logan v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-06-26· cited 21×
• Henderson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-06-13· cited 14×
• Meny v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-09-20· cited 11×
• Christopher v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-02-17· cited 8×
• Pruett v. Norris
  E.D. Arkansas· 1997-03-24· cited 3×
• People v. Mejia
  New York Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 1989-06-16