Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 881 N.E.2d 86
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 262
  • 2008 WL 442514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s yelling of profanities in a tanning salon loudly enough to draw the attention of other customers was sufficient
  • concluding speech directed toward police officers was not unambiguously political where the defendant “assert[ed] a right to be where he was,” a statement that was “ambiguous as to whether [the defendant] was commenting on his own conduct or that of the officers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sharpnack, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.