Anderson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court held that the allegation that the sentence was illegal was not procedurally barred from being raised in a Rule 20 petition even though the issue could have been raised on direct appeal and was not
• wherein this court held that the allegation that the sentence was illegal was not procedurally barred from being raised in a Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. [now Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P.] petition even though the issue could have been but was not raised on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lancaster v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-01-22· cited 117×
• Ladd v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-11-16· cited 9×
• Nicastro v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-07-24· cited 7×
• Sheppard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-03-30
• Looney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-08-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Brannon
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-02-10· cited 84×
• Ex Parte Chambers
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-11-06· cited 69×
• Ex Parte Clisby
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-01-30· cited 52×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-12-12· cited 50×