Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 66 S.W.3d 770
  • 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 256
  • 2002 WL 214513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “‘“movant, when challenging a conviction, must show there is a reasonable probability that, absent the alleged error, the fact finder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt.” ’ ”
  • “Thus, ‘[a]n argument based on trial strategy or tactics is appropriate only if counsel is fully informed of facts which should have been discovered by investigations.’ Clay v. State, 954 S.W.2d 344, 349 (Mo.App.[E.D.]1997).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spinden, Ulrich, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.