Skip to main content
· 10/14/1981

Anderson v. St. Mary's Hospital

Citations

  • 428 N.E.2d 528
  • 101 Ill. App. 3d 596
  • 56 Ill. Dec. 936
  • 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 3553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “where there is a genuine dispute as to the nature or content of the document sought to be discovered, an attorney must ordinarily comply with the trial court’s order for an in camera inspection of the document or be subject to sanctions for contempt”
  • noting that “where there is a genuine dispute as to the nature or content of the document sought to be discovered, an attorney must ordinarily comply with the trial court’s order for an in camera inspection of the document or be subject to sanctions for contempt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kasserman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.