· 10/14/1981
Anderson v. St. Mary's Hospital
Citations
- 428 N.E.2d 528
- 101 Ill. App. 3d 596
- 56 Ill. Dec. 936
- 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 3553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “where there is a genuine dispute as to the nature or content of the document sought to be discovered, an attorney must ordinarily comply with the trial court’s order for an in camera inspection of the document or be subject to sanctions for contempt”
- noting that “where there is a genuine dispute as to the nature or content of the document sought to be discovered, an attorney must ordinarily comply with the trial court’s order for an in camera inspection of the document or be subject to sanctions for contempt”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kasserman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.