Anderson v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• medical journal articles that were not written by or for the peer review committee were privileged under the Act because the committee requested the articles, which were used as a resource in conducting its review
• medical journal articles that were not written by or for the peer review committee were privileged under the Act because the committee requested the articles, which were used as a resource in conducting its review
• medical journal articles that were not written by or for the peer review committee were privileged under the Act because the committee requested the articles, which were used as a resource in conducting its review
• medical journal articles requested by and submitted to the peer review committee for its use during its deliberations were privileged under the Act, and the disclosure of these articles improperly revealed the committee’s internal review process
• medical journal articles requested by and submitted to the peer review committee for its use during its deliberations were privileged under the Act, and the disclosure of these articles improperly revealed the committee’s internal review process
• medical journal articles requested by and submitted to the peer review committee for - 11 - its use during its deliberations were privileged under the Act, and the disclosure of these articles improperly revealed the committee’s internal review process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).