Skip to main content
· 8/20/1990

Anderson v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 58 Wash. App. 1065
  • 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 1195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is not necessary to prove all of the words that are charged to have been spoken. It is sufficient to prove substantially any set of words in some one or more of the statements of slanderous words contained in the [complaint] and the different counts thereof’
  • \[I]t is not necessary to prove all of the words that are charged to have been spoken. It is sufficient to prove substantially any set of words in some one or more of the statements of slanderous words contained in the [complaint] and the different counts thereof.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.