Skip to main content
· 7/1/1992

Anderson v. Public Service Com'n of Utah

Citations

  • 839 P.2d 822
  • 190 Utah Adv. Rep. 24
  • 1992 Utah LEXIS 50
  • 1992 WL 150860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the most burdensome form of service required is that articulated by the legislature
  • observing that Anderson failed to claim his certified letter and concluding that “the agency also has a significant interest in ensuring that parties do not delay or subvert the administrative process by willfully evading notice”
  • noting review of claims that agency action was arbitrary and capricious under section 63-46b-16(4)(h)(iv) is for reasonableness
  • noting review of claims that agency action was arbitrary and capricious under section 63-46b-16(4)(h)(iv) is for reasonableness
  • affirming public service commission’s revocation of limousine service owner’s certificate of operation for failure to maintain proof of insurance and rejecting owner’s argument he was entitled to actual notice
  • license to carry passengers for hire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.