Anderson v. PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding relation back where new factual allegations bore “more than an ‘incidental relationship’” and occurred nine days after events alleged in original complaint
• citing, e.g., Acker v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe R. Co., 215 F.R.D. 645, 651 (D. Kan. 2003); Philippine Am. Life Ins. v. Raytheon Aircraft Co., 252 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (D. Kan. 2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ornelas v. City of Manchester, et al.
  D. New Hampshire· 2017-06-05

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Foman v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
• Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-29· cited 811×
• Burnett v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-02-01· cited 378×
• Jefferson County School District No. R-1 v. Moody's Investor's Services, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 326×
• Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 1982-10-05· cited 288×
• Anderson v. Suiters
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-28· cited 204×
• Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy Enterprises
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-01-19· cited 85×
• Koch v. Koch Industries
  D. Kansas· 1989-06-23· cited 65×
• Williams v. Imhoff
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-02-14· cited 49×
• Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United States
  D. Kansas· 2007-08-10· cited 20×
• Jones v. Wildgen
  D. Kansas· 2004-12-14· cited 20×
• Acker v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
  D. Kansas· 2003-05-22· cited 19×
• Philippine American Life Insurance v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.
  D. Kansas· 2003-02-26· cited 6×