Anderson v. Oscar Mayer & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]xpert testimony that a condition could be causally related to a claimant’s employment, although not sufficient alone to support a finding of causal connection, may be coupled with nonexpert testimony tending to show causation and thus be sufficient to sustain an award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).