Skip to main content
· 11/3/1890

Anderson v. Oliver

Citations

  • 138 Pa. 156
  • 20 A. 981
  • 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1251

Syllabus

<p>[To be reported.]</p> <p>1. When no exception was taken to the refusal by the court below to take off a judgment of peremptory nonsuit entered, the testimony for the plaintiff cannot come before the Supreme Court, and the action of the court below in refusing the motion cannot be reviewed: Bondz v. Penna. Co., ante, 153.</p> <p>2. A direction that a paper be filed, makes it a part of the record only when the law declares that it shall become so upon such filing; wherefore, an order that the official stenographer file his notes of the trial, followed by their filing, will not supply the place of a bill of exceptions : Northumberland Co. Bank v. Eyer, 58 Pa. 97, distinguished.</p> <p>8. A laborer at a furnace, who, while unloading a railroad car in the course of his employment, was injured in consequence of a defective brake thereon, the car being owned by a railroad company and having been delivered by it at the furnace in the defective condition, cannot recover damages for such injury from his employer.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referee’s failure to mention the name of testifying medical witness does not compel conclusion that referee failed to consider all evidence before him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Greek, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxsok, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.