Skip to main content
· 7/1/1903

Anderson v. Matheny

Citations

  • 17 S.D. 225
  • 95 N.W. 911
  • 1903 S.D. LEXIS 21

Syllabus

<p>Under Comp. Laws 1887, § 3545, providing that “the execution of a contract in writing* * * supersedes all oral negotiations or stipulations concerning its matter, which preceded or accompanied the execution of the instrument,” the surety on a note cannot show by parol that he signed under an agreement that, in consideration of the surety’s transfer to the maker of the former’s interest in a firm composed of himself and the maker, the payee would proceed on a mortgage given by the maker, before requiring payment from the surety.</p> <p>Corson J., dissenting.</p>

Judges: Corson, Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.