Anderson v. Martzke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of defendant doctor error where defendant doctor, called as an adverse witness, gave expert testimony sufficient to establish prima facie case
• trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of defendant doctor error where defendant doctor, called as an adverse witness, gave expert testimony sufficient to establish prima facie case
• testimony of a defendant doctor may be sufficient to satisfy the requirement that there be expert testimony as to the issue of acceptable medical standards of care - 38 - 1-17-3065 in a community

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).