Skip to main content
· 12/6/1974

Anderson v. Lappegaard

Citations

  • 224 N.W.2d 504
  • 302 Minn. 266
  • 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • tax on trucker based on weight is merely a return for the “privilege” of using the state’s highways
  • defendant’s untimely motion for summary judgment was properly considered by the trial court where plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was properly before the court and judgment as a matter of law was appropriate
  • defendant's untimely motion for summary judgment was properly considered by the trial court where plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly before the court and judgment as a matter of law was appropriate
  • “The test of whether a tax law violates the due process clause is whether it bears some fiscal relation to the protection, opportunities, and benefits given by the state . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheran, Peterson, Kelly, Mac-Laughlin, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.