Anderson v. L. & N. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disregarding unauthenticated expert report and rejecting belated attempt to cure authenticity defect on surreply
• disregarding unauthenticated expert report and rejecting belated attempt to cure authenticity defect on surreply
• “Plaintiffs rightly recognize that their battery claim rises or falls with their § 1983 excessive force claims: the issue is whether the officers used unreasonable force. If so, they are liable for battery. If not, they are not liable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).