Skip to main content
· 12/18/1975

Anderson v. Kenelly

Citations

  • 547 P.2d 260
  • 37 Colo. App. 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a trial court's \general supervisory power over attorneys as officers of the court ... [to] serutinize contingent fee contracts and determine the reasonableness of the terms thereof\
  • “Under its general supervisory power over attorneys as officers of the court, a court may and should scrutinize contingent fee contracts and determine the reasonableness of the terms thereof.”
  • one-third contingent fee contract held unconscionable, unreasonable, and unfair, where dispute over payment of $26,-373 in insurance proceeds was resolved in one week, and without litigation when the correct date of the decedent’s enlistment in the military was discovered
  • “Caveat emptor is not a legal maxim attributable to the attorney-client relationship.”
  • \Caveat emptor is not a legal maxim attributable to the attorney-client relationship.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.