Fifth Circuit· 1/26/2009

Anderson v. Jackson

Citations

556 F.3d 351
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1890
2009 WL 162412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying preliminary injunction without holding evidentiary hearing where it did not rely on disputed facts in determining whether injunction should issue and where permitted extensive briefing and hear oral argument
affirming district court’s denial of preliminary injunction because district court did not rely on any disputed facts
“Only under ‘extraordinary circumstances’ will this court reverse the denial of a preliminary injunction.”
“Only under ‘extraordinary circumstances’ will this court reverse the denial of a preliminary injunction.”
“Only under ‘extraordinary circumstances’ will this court reverse the denial of a preliminary injunction.”
“Only under ‘extraordinary circumstances’ will this court reverse the denial of a preliminary injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Garza, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Anderson v. Jackson

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.