Anderson v. Human Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an administrative agency’s decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence only when it is clearly evident that the agency should have reached the opposite conclusion
• noting that evidence not admissible under the rules of evidence may be admitted in an administrative proceeding “if the evidence is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonable, prudent men and women in the conduct of their affairs”
• remanding for a new hearing where the erroneous application of the rules of evidence rendered the original hearing unfair to the petitioner
• due process in administrative proceedings involves only parties’ opportunity to cross-examine and offer rebuttal evidence
• due process in administrative proceedings involves only parties' opportunity to cross-examine and offer rebuttal evidence
• discussing the findings of an administrative agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).