Anderson v. Hultman

Citations

• 12 S.D. 105
• 80 N.W. 165
• 1899 S.D. LEXIS 83

Syllabus

<p>1. Where one of three of respondent’s attorneys is admitted to practice in the supreme court, a motion to srike out the motion to dismiss the appeal, the additional abstract on the part of respondent, and his brief, on the ground that two of the attorneys are not admitted to practice in the supreme court, will be denied, as the court will presume that the one admitted was duly authorized to appear, in the absence of proof to the contrary.</p> <p>2. An appeal cannot be taken from two separate and distinct appealable orders.</p> <p>3. Where it affirmatively appears by the abstract that oral evidente was admitted on the hearing of the order appealed from, which is not incorporated in a bill of exceptions settled by the court or judge, the appeal will be dismissed.</p>