Anderson v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts “may take judicial notice of ‘records and reports of 22 administrative bodies’”
• explaining that a court “may take judicial notice of records and reports of administrative 28 bodies”
• noting that “[w]e may take judicial notice of records and reports of administrative bodies.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• holding courts “may take judicial notice of records and reports of 4 administrative bodies” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• taking judicial notice of 26 excerpts from a Senate Report and noting that “[l]egislative history is properly a subject of judicial 27 7 1 notice”
• taking judicial notice of second appeal and merging it with earlier appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).