Anderson v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that, “importantly,” earlier cases which had found that damages were capable of ascertainment at time of entry of adverse judgment “involved misfeasance,” whereas “[t]he present case involves nonfeasance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).