· 12/6/2013
Anderson v. Gates
Citations
- 20 F. Supp. 3d 114
- 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1161
- 2013 WL 6355385
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff did not demonstrate that he properly effected service by mailing the defendants at their work addresses and did not serve an agent designated to accept service
- “Because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over defendants in their individual capacities under Rule 12(b)(5), it is unnecessary to resolve defendants’ Rule 12(b)(2) argument[.]”
- “[F]or a plaintiff to satisfy his burden of establishing a district court's subject-matter jurisdiction under the Little Tucker Act, he must plead a dollar amount in damages, and that amount must not exceed $10,000.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.