Skip to main content
· 12/6/2013

Anderson v. Gates

Citations

  • 20 F. Supp. 3d 114
  • 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1161
  • 2013 WL 6355385
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff did not demonstrate that he properly effected service by mailing the defendants at their work addresses and did not serve an agent designated to accept service
  • “Because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over defendants in their individual capacities under Rule 12(b)(5), it is unnecessary to resolve defendants’ Rule 12(b)(2) argument[.]”
  • “[F]or a plaintiff to satisfy his burden of establishing a district court's subject-matter jurisdiction under the Little Tucker Act, he must plead a dollar amount in damages, and that amount must not exceed $10,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.