Anderson v. Gailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the Idaho Industrial Commission or superior court makes a final decision as to coverage, such determination is res judicata in subsequent proceedings
• where instruction given was substantially identical to plaintiffs' requested instruction, plaintiffs were precluded from assigning it as a ground for reversal on appeal
• where instruction given was substantially identical to plaintiffs’ requested instruction, plaintiffs were precluded from assigning it as a ground for reversal on appeal
• “By having requested this instruction, the plaintiffs were precluded from assigning it as grounds for reversal upon appeal, regardless of whether it was a correct statement of the law.”
• party could not assign as error on appeal the giving of a jury instruction that was substantially identical to an instruction requested by that party, regardless of whether the instruction was a correct statement of the law
• party could not assign as error on appeal the giving of a jury instruction that was substantially identical to an instruction requested by that party, regardless of whether the instruction was a correct statement of the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).