Skip to main content
· 9/1/2009

Anderson v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas, Inc.

Citations

  • 579 F.3d 858
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19624
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,678
  • 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 157
  • 2009 WL 2747013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was not actionable sexual harassment where the plaintiff alleged, among other things, that defendant called her “baby doll” and referred to her as “one of my girls,” along with alleging several incidents of rubbing plaintiffs’ shoulders and back
  • reviewing underlying summary judgment order de novo, but reviewing denial of a motion to reconsider under Rule 59(e) for abuse of discretion
  • reviewing underlying summary judgment de novo
  • same in Title VII 8 context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Hansen, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.