Skip to main content
· 6/21/2006

Anderson v. Eckerd Corp.

Citations

  • 939 So. 2d 386
  • 2006 La. App. LEXIS 1397
  • 2006 WL 1687474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[i]n light of the fact that due process concerns the actual impact of resentencing on a defendant, not percentages, the defendant’s foray into mathematical comparisons is inapposite”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McClendon, Welch, Whipple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.