Anderson v. Durham D & M, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing factors to consider in determining whether an employer’s conduct constitutes a hostile work environment
• issue of retaliation waived where appellant \made only passing reference to retaliation in his opening brief\
• employee being called offensive/profane names by others “as he passed by nearly every time he saw them for almost his entire employment” not sufficient to establish race-based claim
• plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim failed where the complaint offered “little more than speculation and conjecture” that his managers’ name calling, nitpicking, and ridicule had anything to do with race
• “None of the actions by defendant’s managers establish a racially hostile work environment. Plaintiff offers little more than speculation and conjecture that the name calling and nitpicking and ridicule had anything to do with race.”
• “To sustain a claim for hostile work environment, a plaintiff must show that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class; (2) he or she is subjected to unwelcome race-based harassment; (3) the harassment was because of membership in the protected class; and (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).