· 1/21/2014
Anderson v. Discovery Commc'ns, LLC
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1009
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 851
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3424
- 571 U.S. 1164
- 21 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1604
- 2014 WL 210679
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 774
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district 25 court erred in denying a stay when the scope of arbitration was delegated to an arbitral tribunal
- concluding the incorporation of the ICC Rules is clear evidence that the parties delegated questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator
- stating that gateway questions of arbitrability “are 10 presumptively reserved for the court”
- stating gateway questions of arbitrability “are presumptively reserved for the court”
- same as to the International Chamber of Commerce Rules
- same in the International Chamber of Commerce Rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.