Anderson v. Department of Public Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ADA is a “congruent and proportional response to unconstitutional discrimination against disabled individuals,” thereby preventing Pennsylvania from using the Eleventh Amendment immunity as a defense to ADA claims made by private citizens in federal court
• finding the Disabilities Law Project to be “extremely qualified” to represent class in Section 504 case
• in ADA class action, “[census] statistics tending to show that joinder would be impracticable may be sufficient to satisfy Rule 23(a)(1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).