Anderson v. Deas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the conduct of placing a harassing phone call occurs at the place that the call is made
• concluding that defendant who was accused of making three threatening phone calls to woman did not engage in persistent course of conduct with this state when he made daily telephone calls to daughter
• “We further concluded that jurisdiction was not sustainable under paragraph (2) based on [defendant’s] commission of a tortious act within this state.”
• no personal jurisdiction existed over a defendant who made harassing telephone calls to a Georgia resident from another state
• no personal jurisdiction existed over a defendant who made harassing telephone calls to a Georgia resident from another state
• “When a person commits the offense of stalking by placing a harassing or intimidating telephone call to another person, the offense is deemed to occur at the place where the communication is received.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).