Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding reasonable person would have inquired about loss of one million dollars worth of assets
• concluding no due diligence as a matter of law when plaintiff did not seek help after being informed she had lost over one million dollars of stock
• \[The test[ for inquiry notice] is whether the plaintiff has information of cireumstances sufficient to put a reasonable person on inquiry.\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).