Anderson v. Dairyland Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts approach requiring improper motive or improper means in order to establish liability
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts approach requiring improper motive or improper means in order to establish liability
• noting the courts are not as protective of prospective contractual relations as of existing contracts
• nominally adopting the Restatement (Second) definition in Section 766B but using the Oregon elements of improper means or improper motive to define requirement that interference be “improper”
• nominally adopting the Restatement (Second) definition in Section 766B but using the Oregon elements of improper means or improper motive to define requirement that interference be \improper\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).