Anderson v. Cranmer (In Re Cranmer)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a debtor’s exclusion of exempt social security income from his chapter 13 plan cannot constitute a lack of good faith
• noting that in a previous decision, the court recognized that § 1325(b) changed the good faith analysis
• “[N]othing in Lanning suggests a court may disregard the Code’s definition of 24 disposable income in calculating projected disposable income.”
• “[Njothing in Lanning suggests a court may disregard the Code’s definition of disposable income in calculating projected disposable income.”
• using a totality of the circumstances test to determine if a chapter 13 plan has been proposed in good faith
• noting the good faith analysis has a narrower focus after passage of BAPCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).