Anderson v. Cornejo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that most courts that have considered over-detention claims have agreed that they are properly channeled through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
• certifying Fourth Amendment class under Rule 23(b)(3) even though “unique issues might arise at the damages stage”
• certifying Fourth Amendment class under Rule 23(b)(3) even though “unique issues might arise at the damages stage”
• defining class as including individuals who were “subject[ed] to a strip search . . . without any individualized finding of reasonable suspicion or probable cause that [he or she] was concealing contraband or weapons”
• “The second prong of Rule 23(b)(3) militates in favor of class actions where common legal or factual questions allow a court to consolidate otherwise identical actions into a single efficient unit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).