Anderson v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 83 Va. 326
- 2 S.E. 281
- 1887 Va. LEXIS 73
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Proceedings—Circumstantial evidence.—While such evidence is often stronger and more satisfactory than direct evidence, yet it is the well-established rule that in a criminal case circumstantial evidence ought to be acted on with the utmost caution. Grayson’s Case, 6 Gratt. 712, and 7 Gratt. 613.</p> <p>2. Idem—Case at bar.—The. evidence in the record, while creating a suspicion against the prisoner, does not prove his guilt to the exclusion of every reasonable hypothesis consistent with his innocence.</p>
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PienickWashington Supreme Court· 1907-06-29· cited 30×
- Chrisman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-11-05· cited 20×
- Thomas v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1948-03-01· cited 17×
- State v. CristaniSupreme Court of Iowa· 1921-11-22· cited 16×
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1892-11-10· cited 8×
- Finchim v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1887-09-22· cited 7×
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1890-12-11· cited 5×
- Bonner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1925-01-15· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.