Kentucky Supreme Court· 10/28/1993

Anderson v. Commonwealth

Citations

864 S.W.2d 909
1993 Ky. LEXIS 150
1993 WL 442048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing when juror “concealed vital information on voir dire, information which may have justified a challenge for cause in and of itself on grounds of implied bias”
reversing when juror “concealed vital information on voir dire, information which may have justified a challenge for cause in and of itself on grounds of implied bias.”
juror’s failure to reveal, in response to voir dire question, that he was relative of complainant’s boyfriend, mandated that defendants be granted new trial, regardless of whether juror failed to respond intentionally or inadvertently
juror's failure to reveal, in response to voir dire question, that he was relative of complainant's boyfriend, mandated that defendants be granted new trial, regardless of whether juror failed to respond intentionally or inadvertently
juror’s failure to reveal, in response to voir dire question, that he was relative of complainant’s boyfriend, mandated that defendants be granted new trial, regardless of whether juror failed to respond intentionally or inadvertently
evidence that juror concealed relationship by marriage to complainant's boyfriend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens, Combs, Leibson, Reynolds, Spain, Lambert, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.