Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a public defender’s office is not a firm and that “the plain language of rules 1.10 and 1.11 supports the respondent’s contention that [public defenders are government attorneys]”
• holding that a public defender’s office is not a firm and that “the plain language of rules 1.10 and 1.11 supports the respondent’s contention that [public defenders are government attorneys]”
• holding that a public defender’s office is not a firm and that “the plain language of rules 1.10 and 1.11 supports the respondent’s contention that [public defenders are government attorneys]”
• ‘‘a speculative or merely hypo- thetical conflict of interest does not yield a [s]ixth [a]mendment violation’’
• ‘‘an ineffectiveness claim predicated on an actual con- flict of interest is unlike other ineffectiveness claims in that the petitioner need not establish actual prejudice’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).