· 5/24/1993
Anderson v. City of Issaquah
Citations
- 851 P.2d 744
- 70 Wash. App. 64
- 1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that building design ordinance prescribing, inter alia, “harmonious” colors, “appropriate proportions,” and “complimentary details” was unconstitutionally vague, as-applied
- holding building permits must be analyzed according to adopted standards
- \[W]hether a community can exert control over design issues based solely on accepted community aesthetic values is far from `settled' in Washington case law.\
- deprivation of due process when design review board can create ad hoc standards during design review process
- “[Wjhether a community can exert control over design issues based solely on accepted community aesthetic values is far from ‘settled’ in Washington case law.”
- deprivation of due process when design review board can create ad hoc standards during design review process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.