Skip to main content
· 5/24/1993

Anderson v. City of Issaquah

Citations

  • 851 P.2d 744
  • 70 Wash. App. 64
  • 1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that building design ordinance prescribing, inter alia, “harmonious” colors, “appropriate proportions,” and “complimentary details” was unconstitutionally vague, as-applied
  • holding building permits must be analyzed according to adopted standards
  • \[W]hether a community can exert control over design issues based solely on accepted community aesthetic values is far from `settled' in Washington case law.\
  • deprivation of due process when design review board can create ad hoc standards during design review process
  • “[Wjhether a community can exert control over design issues based solely on accepted community aesthetic values is far from ‘settled’ in Washington case law.”
  • deprivation of due process when design review board can create ad hoc standards during design review process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.